2004/10/05

Super Chef vs. Governator: Todd English Fights For Foie Gras Rights


By JULIETTE ROSSANT

Foie GrasIt was in the San Francisco Chronicle last week and the New York Times this morning: the food police are out in California. In fact, food police in California were out in full force last week, supporting Governator Arnold Schwarzenegger’s ban on the force-feeding of ducks and geese for the production of foie gras and on the sale of foie gras made from force-fed birds. California SB 1520 doesn’t go into effect until 2012, but then it will impose a fine of $1,000 a day on violators.

Todd EnglishAccording to The Boston Herald, super chef Todd English asked the Governator not to sign the ban. "I told him not to be the Terminator of foie gras," the Herald reported of English. (For previous entry on this chef, see "Todd English: American Chef - Gone Wild.")

Is foie gras production really so bad? I am not squeamish about much in any cuisine. My motto is, try whatever is best and most popular in any particular culture. In Kazakhstan that meant horsemeat was on the menu. In Turkmenistan I tried camel’s milk. In Lebanon I feasted on raw lamb liver and fat. All these food products are made from animals raised for food, typically in a manner used for centuries. The horses for slaughter are not pets, any more than most 4H calves end up as veal scaloppini. Force-feeding ducks for just two to three weeks in a centuries old tradition to produce a delicacy leaves me with few if any pangs of conscience.

SturgeonOn the other hand, I do support sound regulation of the food industry. I saw for myself first-hand the devastation of the Caspian sturgeon industry that went unregulated after the fall of the Soviet Union. I have researched contraband caviar in Azerbaijan, in Astrakhan (Russia), and Moscow and have seen the toll it took on depleting fish stocks. I support any ban on Caspian caviar until these stocks are replenished.

In the United States we sorely need better regulation of the cattle industry, and not enough has been done since the discovery of mad cow disease here.

So why are legislatures wasting time on foie gras?

Ariane DaguinMuch of the best foie gras I have eaten has come from D’Artagnan, so I ask co-owner Ariane Daguin what she thought of California’s new law. Turns out she had been circulating a petition to urge Schwarzenegger not to pass the law and resist the animal rights activists (e.g., PETA) and nascent food dictators from getting their way.

Ariane wrote to me to explain:
Based on the natural animal tendencies of geese
and ducks to overeat in order to survive during the winter or during long migratory flights, our ancestors, the Egyptian farmers invented foie gras.

Foie gras is a food which has been produced traditionally, throughout generations, by people who live in harmony with nature and animals, as respected links in the ecological chain.

The tradition of foie gras has been perpetuated and developed in certain regions of France, such as Alsace and the South-west, where the preservation of food in fat was vital to feeding the population.

Today, in the world, more than 60,000 families rely on this tradition to survive. They have every desire to ensure the welfare of their animals -- only strong, healthy geese or ducks produce good foie gras.

A foie gras is the healthy liver of an adult animal raised outdoors.

It should be noted that the liver of a duck or goose which returns to an ordinary existence will gradually recover its initial weight. These changes do not affect its physiological functions (study on reversibility -- INRA, 1994).

Some people believe that the increased feeding takes place over a long period of time during breeding. In fact, it only lasts about two weeks and consists of a gradual increase in corn intake, two or three times a day, depending on the species. This process does not stress the animals, as demonstrated by a recent study (INRA 1995).

There is a minority of people against force-feeding. Mostly members of PETA, this group is against any form of exploitation of animals: milking cows, having dogs and cats as pets, using rats to find a cure for cancer. Their battle is not to stop foie gras, their aim is total dictatorship on what we eat.
I support Ariane in urging Californians to help make sure that this law is overturned and does not set a precedent in the rest of the country. Instead, let's turn our attention to sturgeon caviar (click here to read up on US import/export details).

Technorati Tags: , , , , , , , , , , ,

--> back to superchefblog

7 Comments:

Anonymous becca thorne said...

I am against fois gras not because of the over feeding of birds, but because of the force feeding. I do not want a dictatorship ruling how we eat, but respect and kindness for the animals who die so we can eat a tasty meal. The producers of fois gras don't give the birds too big a plate-full of corn, they force a wide plastic tube down their throats and pour the corn directly into the birds stomachs. this is not process i would like to volunteer for, and i'm sure noone else would either. This is a cruel and inhumane way to produce a food which, though no doubt delicious, the world will survive without.

10:20 AM, March 02, 2005  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

The author of this article states that the force feeding of the geese only takes place for two weeks, and it seems that in the author's opinion this, coupled with the fact that it is an age old tradition, makes the process acceptable.
I put this to you; ritual human sacrifice was once an age old tradition in some countries, and the sacrifice would only have to suffer a few moments before they died- not two weeks. Is that acceptable? Should that have been allowed to continue? Before you tell me that is different because humans are involved i will remind you that birds and mammals (including humans) are all warm blooded and have similar nervous systems. The geese and ducks suffer in exactly the same way you or i would to this kind of treatment.

10:30 AM, March 02, 2005  
Anonymous Amelie said...

For your information PETA are against all forms of animal CRUELTY. Many PETA members, organisers and affiliates keep dogs and cats as companion animals, as well as other species of animal (such as factory farm and laboratory escapees) which have been rescued from a life of inhumane and disrespectful treatment. I am from the UK, where people against animal cruelty are in the majority, not the minority. Please try to think about what you are saying before you use derogatory comments about people

10:39 AM, March 02, 2005  
Blogger Ron Toto said...

"The geese and ducks suffer in exactly the same way you or i would to this kind of treatment."


Realy... they tell you this do they? Because both before and after feedings, from what I have seen, they are quite happy. Quacking and running around.

Are there a number of poorly run farms? Yes, but that is not a reason to shut everyone down.

Just about all of thies poorly run farms are still 100 times better then you average industral chicken coop.

3:26 PM, July 11, 2005  
Blogger Juliette Rossant said...

Dear commenters:

Many thanks for making the time to comment: I will reply to each of you.

Becca Thorne: If you read today's article on foie gras, you will find me agreeing closely with New York Times editor Laurence Downes that the species we should be looking at first is the human one.

Anonymous: I find your characterization "geese and ducks suffer in exactly the same way you or i would to this kind of treatment" to be a bit on the absurd: were I the touchy type, I might be offended by being compared to a goose or duck. However, being omnivorous, I think I'd rather eat either.

Amelie: I refer you to my reply to Becca, above: my own first concern is with humans, not animals. Of course, being environmentally minded, I am also concerned for animals, plants, and every other part of our environment -- I just put people first.

Ron Toto: My own sentiments lie closer to yours than to the others' -- though I'm still waiting to hear one of you or someone else comment on humans and not (just) animals)...

Thanks again to each of you.

4:25 PM, July 11, 2005  
Anonymous hugh thomas said...

Hi, i know this is a really really old post, and i only came upon it whilst searching for something else, but i was moved to comment. I admit to being, as a rule, anti foie gras, but i have never really thought about the human aspect. I was aware that foie gras came about due to the birds' winter feeding habits, but these days i know that there are intensive farms too.In these the birds are kept inside, and a worker comes to force feed them from a mechanical tube. I am against any sort of intensive farming where the animals aren't free to live their lives as naturally as possible- and intensive foie gras production is no exception. However, if all foie gras (as a luxury item) were still only produced by the traditional farmers then i would be pretty much okay with it. i probably still wouldn't choose to eat it, but old habits die hard! That would also give the traditional farmers more of a chance, as they wouldn't have to compete with the large scale, intensive producers. Did the ban ever take? Perhaps a ban only on intensively produced foie gras would help everyone (birds included)? One question- does the whole of a foie gras bird get used, or is only the liver taken, and the rest discarded?

12:23 PM, August 29, 2008  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

I too just happened upon this site. One thing is pictures don't lie and if you look at the video on the US Humane Society web page of undercover video (it's always undercover... I think the agri business should have mandatory cameras installed as they don't seem to be able to manage to 'farm' without cruetly)it is very inhumane! If however it was produced organically, and it can be done, then the ducks/geese were humanely slaughtered, then I too would not be opposed. Intensive/factory farming has got to go!!!

1:34 PM, September 14, 2008  

Post a Comment

Links to this post:

Create a Link

<< Home